Promotion
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Angela Su on Contact Us
- David on Fascias-style guttering leak internally
- zaf arain on Plaster home stigma may cost NZers more than actual leaky home issues
- Henry D. on Construction
- ray smith on Fascias-style guttering leak internally
Archives
Categories
- Adjudication
- Building Inspection
- Case Studies
- Compensation
- DBH Determinations
- Design
- Designers & Architects
- Expert Assessment
- Guides
- Hitex Diamond Cladding
- Hitex Research
- Legislation
- Mdu Probe System
- Presentations
- Professionals
- Project M
- Published Papers
- Real Estate Agents
- Research
- RotStop
- Sale & Purchase
- Technologies
- Testimonials
- Timber Treatment Test
- Uncategorized
- University of Auckland
- WHRS
- Your Situation
Category Archives: WHRS
Owners sneak inside the 10 year cut off by one day
Some owners knew their building was approaching the 10 year mark and knew from talking with others that they could claim compensation before 10 years was up, but not after. They decided to install the Mdu Probe System to non-destructively … Continue reading
Posted in Mdu Probe System, WHRS
Leave a comment
WHRS video shows the destructive nature of their testing
Simply put – the WHRS Investigation leaves a building highly stigmatised and damaged and many times prevents the building from being able to be adequately remediated with a targeted repair solution. While this amount of damage is not important if … Continue reading
Posted in Expert Assessment, WHRS
Leave a comment
High court decision: has to be seen to be believed
The recent High Court decision of Chee v Stareast (CIV 2010-404-7804 2 June2011) has important ramifications for claimants and respondents in the leaky home circus. It should also be reverberating amongst experts whose methods of investigation have not changed in … Continue reading
Posted in Adjudication, Expert Assessment, WHRS
Leave a comment
2004 Kelleway Case Study – first WHRS Adjudication
First Adjudication shows distinct “lack of science” during expert investigation and conclusions Understand what is behind reasons for reclad. Arbitrator stated ‘lack of science’ in reaching that award. Weathertightness experts lacked knowledge on what the science was, and got reasons … Continue reading
2009 Mdu Probe Comparative Analysis Report
2009 Mdu Probe Comparative Analysis Report Comparative study; between two WSG reports on the same house using conventional invasive investigation and an investigation based on a moisture detection probes installation In 2009, a report was commissioned by the Department of … Continue reading
Posted in Mdu Probe System, Project M, Research, WHRS
Leave a comment
WHRS Ajudication TRI-2008-100-091
WHRS Ajudication WHRS Ajudication TRI-2008-100-091