Promotion
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Hilary on Fascias-style guttering leak internally
- Tamara Loots on Fascias-style guttering leak internally
- Oliver Phillips on Home
- Nick on Fascias-style guttering leak internally
- Rob Haughey on Fascias-style guttering leak internally
Archives
Categories
- Adjudication
- Building Inspection
- Case Studies
- Compensation
- DBH Determinations
- Design
- Designers & Architects
- Expert Assessment
- Guides
- Hitex Diamond Cladding
- Hitex Research
- Legislation
- Mdu Probe System
- Presentations
- Professionals
- Project M
- Published Papers
- Real Estate Agents
- Research
- RotStop
- Sale & Purchase
- Technologies
- Testimonials
- Timber Treatment Test
- Uncategorized
- University of Auckland
- WHRS
- Your Situation
Category Archives: Adjudication
High court decision: has to be seen to be believed
The recent High Court decision of Chee v Stareast (CIV 2010-404-7804 2 June2011) has important ramifications for claimants and respondents in the leaky home circus. It should also be reverberating amongst experts whose methods of investigation have not changed in … Continue reading
Share on Facebook
Posted in Adjudication, Expert Assessment, WHRS
Leave a comment
2004 Kelleway Case Study – first WHRS Adjudication
First Adjudication shows distinct “lack of science” during expert investigation and conclusions Understand what is behind reasons for reclad. Arbitrator stated ‘lack of science’ in reaching that award. Weathertightness experts lacked knowledge on what the science was, and got reasons … Continue reading
Share on FacebookWHRS Ajudication TRI-2008-100-091
WHRS Ajudication WHRS Ajudication TRI-2008-100-091 Share on Facebook
Share on Facebook