Category Archives: WHRS

Owners sneak inside the 10 year cut off by one day

Some owners knew their building was approaching the 10 year mark and knew from talking with others that they could claim compensation before 10 years was up, but not after. They decided to install the Mdu Probe System to non-destructively … Continue reading

Share on Facebook
Posted in Mdu Probe System, WHRS | Leave a comment

WHRS video shows the destructive nature of their testing

Simply put – the WHRS Investigation leaves a building highly stigmatised and damaged and many times prevents the building from being able to be adequately remediated with a targeted repair solution. While this amount of damage is not important if … Continue reading

Share on Facebook
Posted in Expert Assessment, WHRS | Leave a comment

High court decision: has to be seen to be believed

The recent High Court decision of Chee v Stareast (CIV 2010-404-7804 2 June2011) has important ramifications for claimants and respondents in the leaky home circus. It should also be reverberating amongst experts whose methods of investigation have not changed in … Continue reading

Share on Facebook
Posted in Adjudication, Expert Assessment, WHRS | Leave a comment

2004 Kelleway Case Study – first WHRS Adjudication

First Adjudication shows distinct “lack of science” during expert investigation and conclusions Understand what is behind reasons for reclad. Arbitrator stated ‘lack of science’ in reaching that award. Weathertightness experts lacked knowledge on what the science was, and got reasons … Continue reading

Share on Facebook
Posted in Adjudication, Case Studies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

2009 Mdu Probe Comparative Analysis Report

2009 Mdu Probe Comparative Analysis Report Comparative study; between two WSG reports on the same house using conventional invasive investigation and an investigation based on a moisture detection probes installation In 2009, a report was commissioned by the Department of … Continue reading

Share on Facebook
Posted in Mdu Probe System, Project M, Research, WHRS | Leave a comment

WHRS Ajudication TRI-2008-100-091

WHRS Ajudication WHRS Ajudication TRI-2008-100-091 Share on Facebook

Share on Facebook
Posted in Adjudication, Case Studies | Tagged | Leave a comment